Fix
This commit is contained in:
parent
bbcab11c43
commit
fcb37abd61
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
title: "Playing with SNU Attendance System"
|
title: "Playing with SNU Attendance System"
|
||||||
date: 2024-03-30T18:00:48+09:00
|
date: 2024-03-26T18:00:48+09:00
|
||||||
slug: playing-with-snu-eam
|
slug: playing-with-snu-eam
|
||||||
description: "Playing with SNU EAM"
|
description: "Playing with SNU EAM"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
@ -331,4 +331,4 @@ I dont think there is a way to contain key in blackbox even for end user. User h
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`mitmproxy` done most important job in this case. Nowadays apps uses certificate pinning, but it was also useless with repackaging... So any problems is all sign verification and I think there is no way to perfectly do it.
|
`mitmproxy` done most important job in this case. Nowadays apps uses certificate pinning, but it was also useless with repackaging... So any problems is all sign verification and I think there is no way to perfectly do it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Signature verifing is hard. Using Network is dangerous, and using internal logic can be also bypassed. I think only way to prevent this is in operating system, like in iOS it's much more hard to do this kind of job.
|
Signature verifing is hard. Using Network is dangerous, and using internal logic can be also bypassed. I think only way to prevent this is in operating system, like in iOS it's much more hard to do this kind of job.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue