From f0159e2b5bdee0249f6f90c019ff6c5c641f572b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Watanabe Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 04:24:05 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] process-util: fix typo Also rebreak comment. Follow-up for 03b89cf213d5d1a60601ff158a6366718461fa4b. --- src/basic/process-util.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/basic/process-util.c b/src/basic/process-util.c index 21e296864a..a6ea346f78 100644 --- a/src/basic/process-util.c +++ b/src/basic/process-util.c @@ -2290,9 +2290,8 @@ int read_errno(int errno_fd) { assert(errno_fd >= 0); - /* The issue here is that it's impossible to distinguish between - * an error code returned by child and IO error arrised when reading it. - * So, the function logs errors and return EIO for the later case. */ + /* The issue here is that it's impossible to distinguish between an error code returned by child and + * IO error arose when reading it. So, the function logs errors and return EIO for the later case. */ ssize_t n = loop_read(errno_fd, &r, sizeof(r), /* do_poll = */ false); if (n < 0) {